College Central®

Ask around. The Network works.®

Issues
Bill to recognize unborn

Samantha Young (Las Vegas Review Journal)/WASHINGTON -- The House passed legislation last week that would make it a federal crime to harm a fetus during an assault on a pregnant woman.

Voting 252-172, lawmakers passed the Unborn Victims of Violence Act, which recognizes a fetus six weeks or older as a person. The vote split largely along partisan lines with 198 Republicans supporting the measure along with 53 Democrats and one independent.

Supporters of the measure said a person who assaults a pregnant woman and harms the fetus while committing a federal crime should be tried separately for damage done to the unborn.

An attacker would not need to know a woman was pregnant to be prosecuted under the law. The punishment would be the same as that for similar acts against a person. However, the death penalty would not apply.

The bill includes a provision that abortions performed with a mother's consent would not be considered a criminal act. But critics of the measure said it defines for the first time a fetus as an individual, opening the door for future legislation that could undermine abortion rights.

The House passed the bill last year but it stalled in the Senate under a veto threat from President Clinton. President Bush issued a statement after the vote in support of the bill but it was unclear whether the measure has support to pass in the equally divided Senate.

Alternative Rejected

Lawmakers defeated a Democrat-written amendment that contained harsh penalties for assaulting a pregnant woman but would have removed the language referring to the fetus as an individual.

Supporters of the alternative said the Supreme Court already has declared that a fetus is not recognized as an individual, and a law saying otherwise would be deemed unconstitutional.

However, others pointed out 24 states already have laws on the books making it a crime to destroy a fetus.

The amendment, by Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., was defeated 229-196.

(c) 2001 Las Vegas Review Journal

Return to top

The views and opinions expressed in these articles do not necessarily reflect those of College Central Network, Inc. or its affiliates. Reference to any company, organization, product, or service does not constitute endorsement by College Central Network, Inc., its affiliates or associated companies. The information provided is not intended to replace the advice or guidance of your legal or medical professional.